mick's leadership blog ...

"A beginner's mind takes you where you need to go" (traditional Zen saying)

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Creativity is not always tortured genius, but it is about living right now

from mick's leadership blog

Creativity is not always tortured genius, but it is about living right now

I’ve just been reading Seth’s blog – his latest post is about genius. His most telling point – that “Genius is actually the eventual public recognition of dozens (or hundreds) of failed attempts at solving a problem” rather than some lightning bolt of insight.

This led me to wander around for a while, and I came back to Elizabeth Gilbert’s inspiring TED talk from 2009.

She takes on the idea that creativity is intertwined with being a “tortured artist”. Telling the story of creativity and artistry since the time of the Greeks, via the renaissance, she brings the story up to date with Tom Waits. Here’s a portion of the transcript of Elizabeth’s talk:

... http://bit.ly/bsfQi6

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, February 21, 2010

The positive digital future of books and publishing

mick's leadership blog

"The positive digital future of books and publishing". The surprising conclusion - "With inventory expense, shipping, and returns eliminated, readers will pay less, authors will earn more, and book publishers, rid of their otiose infrastructure, will survive and may prosper."

http://bit.ly/9yYgN7

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , ,

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Jaron Lanier – “You Are Not A Gadget”

mick's leadership blog

Jaron Lanier – “You Are Not A Gadget” – Video from RSA.

http://bit.ly/bpcllO

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: ,

Friday, February 19, 2010

Slavoj Zizek - the most dangerous philosopher in the West"?

mick's leadership blog ... Slavoj Zizek - the most dangerous philosopher in the West"? ... http://tinyurl.com/yfvadn8 Žižek is arguing that we should not repeat the historic mistake of believing a current ideology is the right one for ever. Not everything was bad about Communist thought, and we should do more to politicize decisions in society.

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Baby boomers versus the rest ... are you a pessimist or optimist about the future?

We had a great debate last evening about "the boomer generation", and how they compared with today's young people. We drew a few contextual differences: The boomers were the first to see such massively broad social changes affecting everyone in their generation, and not just a select few. Here's a mix from different parts of the developed world:

  • equality of race and sex became a real goal
  • colonialism started to die
  • the contraceptive pill made sex free and easy
  • tertiary education became broadly available
  • mass consumerism was everywhere
  • "own your own home" arrived, via cheap mortgages paid from increasingly disposable income
  • the military draft ended - after centuries of being the way that armies were raised
  • a "cold" not "hot" war was the military paradigm ...
  • ... aided by the early forms of the European Union, which supplanted centuries of war with less harmful bureaucracy and red tape
  • air travel for leisure became a normal activity, available to ever more people
  • social support programs were broadly available in health and education ...
  • ... yet there was still little apparent change in the "age of dying" - retirement was still expected at 65 for men ... and death by 75 or so.

This all clearly left the boomers as both a blessed and marked generation. Despite today's upheavals, and the recent financial mess, is there the same breadth and complexity of social change today - and what does it mean? We have more and more technology - and business globalization is a "done deal". But I'd argue that both had roots or parallels in the boomer generations, yet are not surrounded by the broader social changes noted above. There were telephones in every home, colour TV, cheap cars, supermarkets. Even in music, I've heard it argued that there will never be another Beatles. Musicians no longer make money on albums - they make it on concerts. The Beatles reached the entire world through albums, worked at a pace rarely seen by today's bands, yet stopped touring ages before they split. I'd suggests that many of the trends we see today have roots in that boomer generation, with three additions:

  1. Today we all belong to non-geographic tribes - not just the Facebook tribe but the micro-Facebook tribes. Boomers were told what their country and therefore tribe was. Now we all chose tribes to suit the mood, it seems. Technology makes this possible, and it will only accelerate. Yet, I'd argue that the tribes are still just a natural implication of the 60's attitudes and aspirations, now made possible by technology.
  2. The "I deserve it now, and then I'll move on" generation. Boomers were just crawling out of World War II, and had to be careful, and rebuild for the future. Yet, again, isn't this just the obvious next step in the consumer society? Like it or not, the boomers started this trend, even if they don't like what they see now.
  3. Technology development has reached critical and sustainable mass - there's more power in my Blackberry than room sized machines had in the 60's. The boomers can't take all the credit for this, but technology in the home was one of their themes. Of course, we generate more knowledge in a year than generations did in times gone by. Research and development is so diverse and broadly democratized that virtually anything may be invented anywhere by anyone these days. I heard Bill Gates, private individual, talk about how he planned to change the way we power this planet at TED last week. He's not waiting for a State-driven Manhattan project. His buddy Nathan Myhrvold was happily shooting down mosquitoes with lasers (maybe he should run "Star Wars"?). Oh, and aren't they both boomers?

Even if you don't fully accept these contextual premises, one critical implication is clear. The boomers have a stranglehold on the world's financial resources, and that is unlikely to shift short term. It's pretty clear that today's boomers will not be handing down all this capital to their kids.

  • First, we all live a lot longer - and with the crunch that now exists on pensions, the boomers will spend what they have accumulated to survive until they die (at 90? 100? 110?).
  • Second, the boomers are now being forced to financially care for both their kids and their parents - who also are living longer ...

Here's an extract from today's Financial Times ... "... a third of the value of all UK pension benefits was held by those aged 55 to 64, the boomer generation that is approaching retirement. Those aged between 45 and 54 held a further quarter of the £3,500bn of pension benefits. The aggregate value of housing wealth held by those aged 50 to pension age – 60 for women and 65 for men – was £1,280bn, more than twice the housing wealth held by any other age group. The next wealthiest group were those between pension age and 75, whose housing wealth was £600bn." So, is it all doom and gloom for young people today? On the surface, yes. It is most unlikely that Government will be able to do much about this. With rare exceptions, Government "sweeps up" after the fact, rather than get ahead of the curve. And a good part of that is the boomer's fault, who are still very unlikely to accept being told what to do by the state - they will use their considerable political and financial power to exert peaceful regime change at every election. Yet there are equally clear causes for major optimism.

  1. Kids are smart and will adapt - they, like all previous generations will innovate and thrive in ways that us older folks will have no inkling about.
  2. Kids will be able pursue their dreams with more freedom. They have more information available, more education, more choices, more communication, more openness in society. Yes, we have domestic terrorism, and that is a relatively new and deadly threat. But we do not have the spectre of mass annihilation. If the Russian or Chinese nuked the US or Europe, all their money and markets would go with the nukes. Hardly a likely prospect - and certainly not the state of affairs in the Cold War.
  3. Kids will live longer ... and the boomers will just die;-)

Thoughts?

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Sunday, February 14, 2010

Ward Shelley: Hand- Painted Visualizations (via Brain Pickings)

How to visualize complex information has always been difficult - and today, with ever more information, it gets harder and harder. Given that communication is a critical skill (and asset) of leaders, this work seems to me be helpful and indeed at the leading edge.

Ward Shelley (who I discovered through Brain Pickings) is a leading exponent of how to visualize the complex. He works over time (Who invented the Avant-Garde, The influences and impact of Frank Zappa, The story of the Beat Poets etc).

It is far more than sketchy mind mapping - it is art in its own right, and has levels of detail which are both informative and astounding.

Ward Shelley

To quote Ward:

"It is the mutually formative effects of subject/mind and object/world that gives shape to the space that exists between them. These paintings are a record of this shaping process. They are about the struggle of form to express content in the cognitive space that exists between the Subject (us) and the Object (the world). If that cognitive space is a territory, these paintings are landscapes of that territory." 

Here's a painting that tracks "Who invented the Avant-Garde ...

 

 

Please fully respect the copyright of Ward's work - I only post it here to help other people discover.

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Sir Ken Robinson, educator extraordinaire ....

Ken Robinson was one of the last speakers at TED2010 today. He was also one of the best, with a powerful yet simple message about change in the education system - valuing each of us for what we are, and not continuing with the "fast food, industrialised" approach we currently have. Each child is unique and should be treated as such.

I thought it might be fun to copy a few tweets which give an idea of his key points (and the great audience response)

@missrogue "Every day our children lay their dreams beneath our feet. We should tread lightly." Sir Ken Robinson #TED

@brainpicker Sir Ken Robinson: "Our education system is impoverishing our spirits as much as fast food is depleting our bodies" #TED

@brainpicker #TED Ken Robinson: It's not about scaling the solution to education, it's about a grassroots model of personalized solutions

@TEDNews: Sir Ken Robinson at #TED: We have built our education systems on the model of fast food. Standardized, not customized to local circumstances

@brainpicker #TED Sir Ken Robinson: People are often good at things they don't care for, but it's about passion. About what moves you.

@mickyates "A watch is a single function device - Ken Robinson's 20 year old daughter - so I don't want one" #TED

@Michaelgnovak: RT @brainpicker: #TED Sir Ken Robinson's book, The Element: How Finding Your Passion Changes Everything, is a MUST read http://is.gd/8jUKl

@brainpicker "Human communities depend on a diversity of talent" Ken Robinson #TED #quote

Here's Ken's Huffington Post article from today on a slightly different - but related topic ..."Imagine a World Ending Slavery"

"As part of the work we do in education, my wife Terry and I are committed to promoting a world in which all children live in freedom. This is why we support the Tronie Foundation in its work to ensure that all children live free of exploitation and have the opportunity to laugh, play and go to school. Many estimates agree that there are now about 27 million slaves in the world, more than at the height of institutionalized slavery in the 19th century. These are men, women and children held against their will with the threat of violence and little or no pay to do what ever their owners demand. Often these are what are known as 3D jobs -- dirty difficult and dangerous -- that few people with a free choice would tolerate. It's estimated that roughly half of all slaves are children.

The good news is that there are people and organizations around the world fighting separately and together to end slavery in all of its forms. They range from government agencies to private foundations and the, often heroic, efforts of lone individuals. All are committed to ending practices that degrade all of us. One such organization is the Tronie Foundation.

Rani and Tron are acting from first-hand experience. They found their separate ways to the United States as children. Rani was sold and resold into slavery as a child in India and then into illegal adoption in the USA. Tron was shipwrecked off the coast of Vietnam after his father's desperate attempt to save him from being abducted as a boy soldier. As adults and parents, they are now committed to the global struggle to offer the gift of freedom to every child.

People around the world are ringing in a New Year. This could also be a new time of awakening. For the United States, freedom is a founding principle. Here especially we should support those who do so much to defend it on our behalf and for the children we all say we cherish. Take a look.

http://TronieFoundation.org/donate

Biography extract from his webpage:

"Sir Ken Robinson, PhD is an internationally recognized leader in the development of creativity, innovation and human resources. In 1998, he led a national commission on creativity, education and the economy for the UK Government. ‘All Our Futures: Creativity, Culture and Education’ (The Robinson Report) was published to wide acclaim in 1999. He was the central figure in developing a strategy for creative and economic development as part of the Peace Process in Northern Ireland, working with the ministers for training, education enterprise and culture.For twelve years, he was Professor of Education at the University of Warwick in the UK and is now Professor Emeritus. He has been honored with the Athena Award of the Rhode Island School of Design for services to the arts and education; the Peabody Medal for contributions to the arts and culture in the United States, and the Benjamin Franklin Medal of the Royal Society of Arts for outstanding contributions to cultural relations between the United Kingdom and the United States. In 2003, he received a knighthood from Queen Elizabeth II for his services to the arts."

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , , , , ,

"The Price in Human Suffering of Being Open-Minded" Sam Harris @TED 2010

A thoughtful summary of Sam Harris' excellent talk at TED this week. From Wired at Epicenter - by Kim Zetter - from TED

Sam Harris

"In a well-meaning attempt to be tolerant of other cultures and religions we often blithely subvert our

values and morality, says Sam Harris, the outspoken critic of blind religious faith. We do this because we think that questions about good and evil or right and wrong cannot be answered definitively. But they can, he told a rapt audience at the Technology, Entertainment and Design conference Thursday — and they should.

Harris is no stranger to the argument that, to put it more mildly than he might, religion does more harm than good. His 2005 New York Times bestseller The End of Faith attempted to draw a straight line from faith to human atrocities. His subsequent Letter to a Christian Nation took on the fierce pushback he received from writing his first book.

So it should come as no surprise that Harris ran with this theme at TED, expanding his argument beyond the faithful to the secular-leaning. Scientists and academics, who are wedded to facts and empiricism, he said, do something different when they talk about morality. “We value differences of opinion in a way that we don’t in other areas,” Harris said.

We know that there are fundamentally right and wrong answers to certain questions and issues, but do not trust our instincts, he said. These cast-aside tenets should respected and should be the basis of a universal morality, regardless of variations in cultures and belief.

Even within a single culture it’s easy to fall into a morally relativistic trap, he said. For example, Harris noted, there are 21 states in the U.S. where it’s legal for a teacher to beat a child with a wooden board to the point of leaving bruises and breaking skin. The rationale for this behavior is the Biblical quote about sparing the rod and spoiling the child. The obvious question, Harris said, is whether it is actually a sound idea to subject children to pain and violence and public humiliation as a way of encouraging healthy emotional development and good behavior.

He also pointed to the issue of women in the Muslim world who cover themselves in burqas.

“I’m not talking about voluntary wearing of a veil. Women should be able to wear whatever they want,” he said. But it’s not an option when not wearing a burqa is a punishable offense. And even more importantly, he said, what of those cultures which punish a brutalized woman, where “when a girl gets raped, her father’s first impulse, rather often, is to murder her out of shame?”

We should not feel constrained to assert what we think is an objective truth — that such behavior is wrong — for fear that it will be taken as subjective meddling or demagoguery, Harris argued. There is a moral imperative not to hold one’s tongue but rather to speak out.

“Who are we not to say [that it's wrong]?” he asked. “Who are we to pretend that we know so little about human well being that we have to be nonjudgmental about a practice like this?” We can no longer respect and tolerate vast differences of opinion of what constitutes basic humanity any more than we can take seriously different opinions about how disease spreads or what it takes to make buildings and airplanes safe, Harris insisted.

We simply must converge on the answers we give to the most important question in human life, Harris concluded. And to do that we have to admit that there are answers."

Here's the original post on Wired

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, February 12, 2010

Sex, lasers and suspended animation: day two at TED - Amanda Gefter @ New Scientist

From New Scientist's Culture Lab blog - by Amanda Gefter, Books & Arts editor

Ted dancer.jpg"It's been another mind-boggling day here at TED 2010 in Long Beach, California, where some of the most innovative minds in science and technology have gathered to share their ideas to change the world.

The morning began with Michael Specter, New Yorker writer and author of Denialism (Penguin, 2009), who is disheartened by irrational and dangerous public attitudes towards everything from vaccines to genetically modified foods. What people often don't understand, he said, is the dicey relationship between causation and correlation--even really smart people, like those in the audience at TED.

"How many of you took your Echinacea and antioxidants this morning, even though data shows they do nothing more than make your urine dark?" he asked, as the crowd laughed their admission. "Hey, I get it! You want to pay $20 billion a year for dark urine? I'm with you! Dark! Urine!"

Philosopher and neuroscientist Sam Harris - known as one of the four horsemen of "new atheism" - offered up a controversial but empowering argument against cultural relativism, claiming that unlike what religious people often claim, science does have something to say about morality.

harris2.jpg"When we're talking about values, we're talking about facts," he argued. "Values reduce to facts about conscious experience." His comments resonated well with Specter's earlier complaint: "Everyone is entitled to their opinion," Specter had said, "even their opinion about progress. But you know what you're not entitled to? You're not entitled to your own facts."

Epidemiologist Elizabeth Pisani, author of The Wisdom of Whores (W.W. Norton, 2009), offered a serious yet highly entertaining look at why populations most at risk for HIV--such as sex workers and intravenous drug users--make the health choices that they make, urging us to demand public health policies based on scientific evidence and common sense. She also had a message for Pope Benedict XVI, who last year told African leaders that condom distribution will worsen the AIDS epidemic, presumably because they will inspire people to go out and have more sex.

"I don't know if the Pope watches TED talks online," Pisani said, "but if you do, I've got news for you, Benedict. I carry condoms all the time and I never get laid!" She reached into her pockets and tossed some condoms into the crowd.

crowd.jpgSoon after, TED attendees were treated to a surprise talk by Valerie Plame Wilson, the former covert CIA operative who was outed by the Bush administration, who spoke about nuclear proliferation. "There is enough highly enriched uranium in the world to make 100,000 nuclear bombs," she said, and the only solution is to get rid of it all. This provided an interesting inroad to the afternoon's impassioned nuclear energy debate between Stewart Brand and Mark Jacobson.

And the day just got more interesting from there. The fabulously entertaining game designer Jane McGonigal began her talk with this statistic: online game enthusiasts now collectively spend 3 billion hours a week playing in virtual worlds. "Three billion hours a week is not enough to save the world," she said. "To survive the next century, we need to log at least 21 billion hours of game play every week."

jane.jpgMcGonigal believes that gamers are "super-empowered hopeful individuals" who believe they can change the world. "The problem is that they believe they can change the virtual world, not the real world," she said. "That's what I'm trying to change. We need to make the real world more like the virtual world." She's trying to do just that by designing multi-player games that tackle real-world challenges like oil shortages and climate change.

David Byrne, frontman from the Talking Heads, discussed his idea that throughout history, the creation of music has been informed by the architecture of the venues in which the music was to be performed--not unlike birds whose songs evolve to best fit their niche environments.

After a moving and venue-appropriate performance by one-man-band Andrew Bird, inventor Nathan Myhrvold told the crowd about his endeavors to tackle the malaria crisis. Everyone has been trying to develop vaccines and distribute mosquito nets, he said, but why not also go after the mosquitoes themselves? In fact, why not shoot them out of thesky with lasers? He then put his pinky finger to his mouth, Dr. Evil style, before demonstrating a prototype of a laser that does exactly that.

And speaking of vaccines, epidemiologist Seth Berkeley is convinced that we are close to making a universal HIV vaccine and a universal flu vaccine thanks to his new approach of retro-vaccinology, a process where you start with the antibodies you want to produce and work backwards to find the right vaccine. New technologies will allow such vaccines to be made in simple E. coli cultures rather than the current cumbersome method of using live chicken eggs. After all, he said, what happens when an avian flu affects chickens?

To wrap up the evening, biologist Mark Roth talked a bit about sea monkeys. As every kid knows, when you order sea monkeys, they arrive in a bag that's been sitting on a shelf for who-knows-how-long, you toss them into some water and suddenly you have little shrimp swimming around. Everyone's amazed by what happens when you put them in the water, Roth said, but what I wanted to know was, what's going on in that bag?

roth.jpgRoth has been working on suspended animation and has achieved some remarkable things, deanimating mammals like mice until their hearts stop and their oxygen consumption hits rock bottom, then bringing them back to life where they are as healthy as ever before. Roth figured out that a winning combination of hydrogen sulfide and extreme cold could do the same for humans, an extremely useful fact to know in an emergency situation like a heart attack. Roth's suspended animation drugs are now in human trials.

One thing that's clear here at TED is that the future is going to look remarkably different from the past, thanks to brilliant minds like these. But forget the future. I just can't wait for day three."

Images: TED/James Duncan Davidson

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jamie Oliver & TED Prize: Video of his speech "Educate every child about food"

An inspiring and passionate talk at TED 2010, as Jamie puts forward his wish.

"I wish for everyone to help create a strong, sustainable movement to educate every child about food, inspire familes to cook again and empower people everywhere to fight obesity".

There is a debate about Jamie's ideas online at TED. Some felt he lacked facts, others that he over-dramatised. But however you cut it, the idea that obesity is preventable and that healthy cooking can have a profound, positive impact is compelling. It needs a concerted effort at home, in schools and across industry.

Jamie's speech is full of passion and challenge - and there can be no doubt one is watching a leader at work. A man with a vision, and the character to make change happen. We should all hope he succeeds. Want more detail? Check out his campaigns and his successes.

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Thought Experiments at TED - Helen Walters @ Business Week |Next

Another great post on yesterday's TED 2010 .... from Helen Walters at Business Week.

"Perhaps it was the title of the track: Mindshift. But three of the speakers in the first session at TED all threw out a thought experiment at the gathered crowd. A meme, I say, a veritable meme!

kahneman.jpgNobel Prize-winning behavioral economist Daniel Kahneman, kicked off the event proper. He challenged us to imagine that after our next vacation, all our photographs would be destroyed. Then we’d take a drug that would mean that we wouldn’t remember anything about our holiday. Would we, asked Kahneman, still choose to go on the same vacation? His question was intended to illuminate the difference between the “experiencing self”, which lives in the present, and the “remembering self”, which keeps track of memories.

These two very different concepts cause very different responses—and are important considerations for those looking to study happiness, a deeply complex concept. It was a lyrical presentation and a thought-provoking way to start the day.

duflo.jpgThe next thought experiment came courtesy of French economist and poverty specialist, www.mit.edu/faculty/eduflo/short" target="_"blank"">Esther Duflo. “You have a few million dollars,” she said. “Maybe you’re a politician in a developing country and you want to spend it on the poor. How do you spend it?” Duflo used this set-up to add nuance to the discussion around aid and global poverty, throwing out some stark statistics as she did so. For instance, she said, nine million children under the age of five die every year. “That’s the devastation of Haiti’s earthquake every eight days. And entirely preventable.”

In Duflo’s eyes, individuals are so hampered by the scope and weight and sadness of the thought of global poverty that they end up not doing anything at all. “There’s no silver bullet, and it’s very frustrating,” she acknowledged. But, she added, even small measures can have a large impact. “So much of the discussion around poverty generates emotion and rhetoric that is more ideological than practical,” she said. “Just do an experiment.” An economist in tune with the “always-in-beta”, “launch-early; launch-often” mantra of our times.

shermer.jpgFinal thought experiment for the morning came from Michael Shermer, founding publisher of Skeptic magazine. Imagine you’re a hominid on the plains of America, he said, when you hear a rustle in the grass. Is it a dangerous predator, or is it the wind? Your decision, he said drily, is important. Get it wrong by believing that it’s wind when it’s actually a predator and you’re history. “You won a Darwin award. You’ve been taken out of gene pool.” Shermer’s point, in an entertaining presentation, was to show that human beings look for patterns, and have a tendency to infuse patterns with meaning.

Given the title of the magazine Shermer oversees, I imagined he was preaching to us all to stop being taken in by everything. Not the case. “If you’re too skeptical you miss the really good ideas,” he said. If you’re not skeptical enough, you’ll see patterns everywhere, and that way madness lies (here he used mathematician John Nash as an example of someone who had found too many patterns). “But just right and you don’t fall for too much baloney.” There’s a lesson there for everyone: question everything, but don’t be a cynic."

All images courtesy of TED/James Duncan Davidson

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , , , , , ,

Dr William Li's list of Antiangiogenic substances ... which slow down cancer

Fascinating talk at TED 2010 about the power of diet to hold back the growth of cancers ... by restricting the blood flow to nascent cancer cells. Food that is "antiangiogenic" will help ...

TED 2010

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

TED2010 ... today's agenda ...

TED 2010 speaker list for today ... let's go!

Wednesday, February 10, 2010
11:00 AM – 12:45 PM Session 1: Mindshift
  • Behavioral economics founder
  • Development economist
  • Skeptic
  • Ukulele virtuoso
2:15 PM – 4:00 PM Session 2: Discovery
  • Cancer researcher
  • Spider silk scientist
  • Chef
5:00 PM – 6:45 PM Session 3: Action. The 2010 TED Prize
  • Chef, activist
  • Provocateurs, storytellers, pioneers
  • Singer/songwriter, activist

Daniel Kahneman

William Li

Jamie Oliver

Sheryl Crow

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, February 02, 2010

Jaron Lanier at the RSA - "You Are Not A Gadget"

One of the things I really enjoy as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts (the RSA) is attending their thought-provoking talks and conversations. Last night Jaron Lanier was talking about his new book, "You Are Not A Gadget". He is a computer scientist, composer, visual artist, and author.

As the talk synopsis said, Jaron is worried that " Individual creativity has begun to go out of fashion. Machines, specifically computers, are no longer just tools to be used by the human mind - these days, we treat them as if they are altogether better than humans."

In essence he is saying that we should all be pro-internet, pro-technology - but there are certain myths (e.g. "everything that's best is free", "social networking is always a good thing") and certain problems (e.g. "our gadgets/technology drive us not the other way round") that we should fight against. Only by challenging these can we nurture individual creativity (and thus further develop our own humanity).

Jaron wrote an article for the WSJ earlier this month - and rather than try to further explain his proposition, let me extract a couple of paragraphs from that article ...

"Most people know me as the "father of Virtual Reality technology." In the 1980s and 1990s, I was a young computer scientist and entrepreneur working on how to apply virtual reality to things like surgical simulation. But I was also part of a circle of friends who tried to imagine how computers would fit into the peoples' lives, including how people might make a living in the future. Our dream came true, in part. It turns out that millions of people are ready to contribute instead of sitting passively on the couch watching television. On the other hand, we made a huge mistake in making those contributions unpaid, and often anonymous, because those bad decisions robbed people of dignity. I am appalled that our old fantasies have become so entrenched that it's hard to get anyone to remember that there are alternatives to a framework that isn't working.

technology_coveHere's one problem with digital collectivism: We shouldn't want the whole world to take on the quality of having been designed by a committee. When you have everyone collaborate on everything, you generate a dull, average outcome in all things. You don't get innovation.

If you want to foster creativity and excellence, you have to introduce some boundaries. Teams need some privacy from one another to develop unique approaches to any kind of competition. Scientists need some time in private before publication to get their results in order. Making everything open all the time creates what I call a global mush.

There's a dominant dogma in the online culture of the moment that collectives make the best stuff, but it hasn't proven to be true. The most sophisticated, influential and lucrative examples of computer code—like the page-rank algorithms in the top search engines or Adobe's Flash— always turn out to be the results of proprietary development. Indeed, the adored iPhone came out of what many regard as the most closed, tyrannically managed software-development shop on Earth."

You can read in full Jaron's article here.

What was also interesting was that Nico Macdonald, the RSA's event moderator, encouraged the audience to comment and ask questions in real time via twitter, complete with its own hashtag. Here's a sample of the stream ....

@ThinkAboutArt Thanks to Jaron Lanier for stating that artists deserve the dignity of their own creative work!! http://bit.ly/8Q4CpP #rsalanier

@mahemoff "The Machine Stops" is one of the most prescient things ever written acc to Lanier #rsalanier

@milwardoliver Interesting thought out of #rsalanier that children on facebook have their growing up recorded in digital form without the ability to forget.

@mickyates "The geeks have created a world that benefits geeks - so others are denied chance for own personality formation" Jaron #rsalanier

@tomux @melex #rsalanier. It's like a health-food movement for the internet generation. We should eat more broccoli.

@petemarcus Economic model of 'free' doesn't work. Web does not provide bounty if you give your stuff away for free. #rsalanier

@petemarcus Originally PCs allowed consumers to also be creators. New devices like Kindles only make us consumers now. #rsalanier

@melex #rsalanier Lanier concludes that he's not anti-tech per se, but is against 'ritualistic, anti-human design'. Hear hear, sense at last.

@mickyates It's not a problem with the internet - that's brilliant - it's the dogma of the "open/free culture" of web 2.0 that's the issue! #rsalanier

So, quite an event - and an exercise in the new (social media) and the old (the RSA - or more completely the "Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce - a cradle of enlightenment thinking and a force for social progress", founded in 1754) that was fascinating in its own right.

The RSA's founder, William Shipley, would have been proud!

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, January 31, 2010

Can You Learn to be Self-Disciplined? Ali Hale

From the PickTheBrain blog, by Ali Hale, on January 29th

A lot of people have quite a fatalistic attitude towards self-discipline. They see themselves as essentially undisciplined people who lack the stamina to follow through on their decisions. They might talk about a “procrastination problem” or “no will power”. They blame their lack of self-discipline for their inability to get their business off the ground, or finish college, or successfully quit smoking or diet.

I don’t believe that any of us are lost causes when it comes to self-discipline. I also don’t think that any of us are born with iron wills or great tenacity: it’s something which we learn.

Short-Time Pleasure

A lack of self-discipline is often the result of a focus on short-term pleasure over long-term rewards. You might have experienced this a lot as a teen or in college, prioritising partying or computer games over studying! And, at the time, you might have been quite annoyed by adults who tried to persuade you to knuckle down and get on with your homework. Perhaps you used to blow your allowance money on CDs, only to end up broke and unable to go out with friends. 

As we grow up, we learn (sometimes painfully) that it’s often worth enduring some short-term difficulties in order to have longer-term happiness.

How You Developed Self-Discipline

In most cases, we become more self-disciplined as we grow older. If you think back to your childhood or teens, you can probably remember times when you had almost no self-discipline. I suspect that now:

  • You’re able to get up on time when you have to go to work – without dad yelling at you to get out of bed
  • You make sure you have enough money to pay your bills – without mom doling it out in small installments
  • You keep your home reasonably clean: not because your parents are nagging you to do your chores, but because you want to have clean dishes to eat off!

Even though you might feel that you’re not very self-disciplined, you have learnt to delay gratification and to get on with things that aren’t necessarily end-to-end fun – because you know that life’s easier that way.

Growing the Self-Discipline Muscle

In college, I used to regularly drink far too much. I stayed up late at night playing computer games, and often dashed off essays at the last minute. I expect that might sound pretty familiar! However, I now make a living freelancing – and I’ve also written around 200,000 words of fiction in the past year. I probably wouldn’t have had the self-discipline to do what I do today, six years ago.

If you’ve ever worked out in the gym, you’ll know how quickly you can build up muscles. Your self-discipline is a bit like a muscle: the more you use it, the stronger it’ll become. However, if you try to do far too much too soon, you’ll just fail and end up disappointed.

So how can you actively improve your self discipline?

  • Pick three things you will definitely accomplish tomorrow. Many of us have real trouble in actually getting on with the things which we want to get done – we let interruptions and distractions take over our day.
  • Take a thirty-day trial. If you’re trying to lose weight, take up exercise, etc, doing it for thirty days can give you more motivation and focus than if you simply try to do it indefinitely. You can always choose to extend the trial. (If thirty days is too long, try a week.)
  • Get into the habit of fulfilling your promises – and ask those around you to keep you accountable. If both you and your partner know that when you say “I’ll cook tonight” that it’s not going to happen, then make sure that changes.
  • Talk to friends or read books or blogs which encourage you – either by offering advice or by setting an example to follow. I like Dave Navarro’s no-nonsense Rock Your Day.

Above all, stop telling yourself that you “just aren’t self-disciplined”. Don’t see your levels of self-discipline as something dictated by fate – see them as something you can actively earn and improve upon.

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Chimamanda Adichie: The danger of a single story

Our lives, our cultures, are composed of many overlapping stories. Novelist Chimamanda Adichie tells the story of how she found her authentic cultural voice -- and warns that if we hear only a single story about another person or country, we risk a critical misunderstanding.

Inspired by Nigerian history and tragedies all but forgotten by recent generations of westerners, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s novels and stories are jewels in the crown of diasporan literature.

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, January 09, 2010

The Decade in Management Ideas - from Harvard Business School Executive Education

Tis the season for "year's best" lists — and even, this year, for "decade's best" lists — and who are we to resist the urge? A few of us HBR editors (Gardiner Morse and Steve Prokesch helped especially) took the opportunity to look back on the past ten years of management thinking and are ready to declare our choices for the — well, why not say it — most influential management ideas of the millennium (so far).

  1. Shareholder Value as a Strategy. The notion of producing attractive returns for investors is as old as investing, but this was a decade when the pursuit of shareholder value eclipsed too much else. Increasingly sophisticated tools and metrics for value-based managementpushed the consideration of stock price effects deep into operational decision-making, and made sure everything pointed toward bonus day. By 2009, even the man most known for focusing on value was saying it was a dumb idea. "Shareholder value is a result, not a strategy," Jack Welch proclaimed. "Your main constituencies are your employees, your customers and your products.
  2. IT as a Utility. The current mania for cloud computing is the latest step in a long process by which enterprises have dispensed with their proprietary glass houses and begun buying computing capabilities as services. One impetus was the Y2K scare, which forced attention onto those onerous legacy systems as the new millennium dawned.
  3. The Customer Chorus. Through a range of technical and social developments, customers' voices grew louder (whether collectively in ratings systems like Amazon's, or individually through viral kvetches like Dave Carroll's "United Breaks Guitars") and companies found ways to listen. It's a true megatrend: the steps along the way have felt gradual and natural, but collectively they change everything.
  4. Enterprise Risk Management. Sounds crazy right now to say that the last decade was notable for risk management. But especially after 9/11, companies saw the sense of bringing the many and various pockets of it under the same umbrella. Newly empowered chief risk officers looked for trouble spots on a landscape ranging from financial hedging to pirates on the open sea.
  5. The Creative Organization. The decade saw a general revolution in the way many organizations came to view their source of competitive advantage, and a commitment to finding ways to produce creative output more reliably. Even before they embraced "design thinking," managers were encouraging collaboration, drawing on diverse perspectives, and engaging whole workforces in "ideation."
  6. Open Source. Purist geeks will be quick to point out that the term open source and some very substantial achievements came in the late 1990s, but here we pay homage to the spread of that model beyond software code. Was it only in 2001 that Wikipedia was born? And how many things have been wiki'ed since?
  7. Going Private. Cheap debt reignited the LBO scene just as post-Enron reforms created real disincentives to operate as a public company. As the decade wore on, private equity's playbook for turning around businesses was increasingly held up as best-practice management. Now, ideas like, ahem, leveraging up don't seem so wise, but private equity's devotion to strategic focus and demanding governance might endure.
  8. Behavioral Economics. Okay, by now, you're all shouting "that's definitely older than 10 years" and you're right. But talk about a set of ideas whose time has come. In the prior decade, can you remember when someone with Steven Levitt's profile had a breakout bestseller? Or when someone modifying the word economist with "rogue" (or "rock star") could keep a straight face?
  9. High Potentials. Consulting firms and other deeply knowledge-based businesses knew this all along, but in the past decade the rest of the corporate world woke up to the fact that some managers are more equal than others. Formal programs were established to identify, cultivate, and retain "hi-po's". Executive coaching, a perk often provided for the anointed, experienced explosive growth as an industry.
  10. Competing on Analytics. Decades of investment in systems capturing transactions and feedback finally yielded a toolkit for turning all that data into intelligence. Operations research types, long consigned to engineering realms like manufacturing scheduling, got involved in marketing decisions. Managers started learning from experiments that were worthy of the name.
  11. Reverse Innovation. The bigger story here is the maturation of the concept of globalization, particularly with regard to emerging economies. Most big corporations in 2000 saw them primarily as a source of natural resources and, increasingly, cheap labor. Then, as rising employment fueled the development of middle classes, cities in India and China came to represent valuable markets. Now, these non-US consumers are coming to the foreground. Firms like GE and Microsoft are doing R&D in emerging markets, optimizing on those preferences and constraints, and then bringing the results back home.
  12. Sustainability. More than anything, the first ten years of the 21st century will be remembered as the decade that businesses went green — if only in their marketing to a public highly attuned to Al Gore's inconvenient truth. We're not cynical on this point, however. The efforts we see by companies large and small to reduce their carbon footprints and other environmental impacts are sincere and effective, as far as they go. But ten years from now, as we revisit this exercise, forgive us if we declare 2010-2020 to be the decade of sustainability. "The idea was in the air before 2010," we can picture ourselves writing. "But this was the decade when it really took hold."

So there it is: our roundup of the management ideas that shaped the decade. Now, you tell us: Which ones don't belong on this list? And what did we miss?

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , ,

Friday, December 18, 2009

Scott Kim takes apart the art of puzzles - from TED 2008

Fascinating talk which does open the mind, in the best TED tradition ...

"At the 2008 EG conference, famed puzzle designer Scott Kim takes us inside the puzzle-maker's frame of mind. Sampling his career's work, he introduces a few of the most popular types, and shares the fascinations that inspired some of his best."

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , , ,

Monday, December 14, 2009

What Matters Now - a fascinating (and free!) eBook from Seth Godin

I always find Seth Godin's work interesting (like so many other people do, of course). So I thought I'd help share his latest free eBook. Here's the post from Seth's blog:

What Matters now?"Now, more than ever, we need to shake things up.

Now, more than ever, we need a different way of thinking, a useful way to focus and the energy to turn the game around. I hope a new ebook I've organized will get you started on that path. It took months, but I think you'll find it worth it the effort.

Here are more than seventy big thinkers, each sharing an idea for you to think about as we head into the new year. From bestselling author Elizabeth Gilbert to brilliant tech thinker Kevin Kelly, from publisher Tim O'Reilly to radio host Dave Ramsey, there are some important people riffing about important ideas here. The ebook includes Tom Peters, Jackie Huba and Jason Fried, along with Gina Trapani, Bill Taylor and Alan Webber.

Here's the deal: it's free. Download it here.

Or from any of the many sites around the web that are posting it with insightful commentary. Tweet it, email it, post it on your own site. I think it might be fun to make up your own riff and post it on your blog or online profile as well. It's a good exercise. Can we get this in the hands of 5 million people? You can find an easy to use version on Scribd as well.

Please share.Have fun. Here's to a year with ideas even bigger than these. Here's a lens with all the links plus an astonishing array of books by our authors."

I hope you enjoy!

Posted via web from mick's posterous

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, December 01, 2008

Engaging Ideas

From the marktd blog, by Nico Margolis

A while back, we wrote a short post about the Engaging Ideas Card Pack and mentioned, “We haven’t gotten our hands on the full set, but it looks like a neat package for a broad range of ideas.” Well, now (thanks to Rob Fox) we’ve gotten our grubs on the entire pack and sifted through the stack of colorful cards.

The first impression is that they look like a deck of large novelty sized playing cards printed on thick stock cardboard. The front side of each card is an image meant to invoke the message or activity presented on the back. For the most part, the full card formatted images are stellar, ranging from iconic art and expressive photography down to some painfully low resolution and pixelated images. However, given the goals of the cards to engage employees through practical exercises, this is a rather minor point.

52-card deck (not including two jokers) is meant to stimulate positive discussion through identification of business goals and ideals. The cards are divided into three general categories: Discover, Design and Deliver. In this hierarchy of inspiration the cards build on each other by slowly introducing more complex activities, interspersed with straightforward tips.

The themes that appeared the most were honing the effectiveness of leadership, identifying core values and honing the business environment to suit the challenges ahead.


Here are two sample cards that we think embody the entire project:

21. Distributed Leadership

We tend to think that leadership is something that happens at the top. True, but what is perhaps more true is that acts of leadership happen across and throughout business, day in, day out. Identify these acts of leadership, encourage them and communicate them widely. Doing so helps to demonstrate that all people can offer leadership and will also help acts of leadership to flourish. This exercise also begs an answer to a fundamentally important question necessary to achieve higher levels of engagement: what does your business recognize as leadership?

48. Heartstorming

A success factor for any engagement effort is to discover, design and deliver better ways to connect emotionally with people to inspire their commitment and action. To help accomplish this make “heartstorming” rather than just brainstorming, a core aspect of your business’ problem solving and change practices. Demonstrating difference, “heartstorming” will help to uncover and build stronger emotional connections by focusing groups on questions like:

  • I love it when…
  • I get a kick out of it when…
  • My heart beats faster when…
  • I’m energized when…
  • It frustrates me when…
  • I feel undermined when…
  • I’m intimidated when…
  • I feel powerless when…
Read the rest of the review ....

Labels: , ,